
Centre Policy for Determining Teacher Assessed Grades – Summer 2021 (and Future Use).
Updated July 2025
​
​The Centre Policy developed by The O’Brien International School for the Summer 2021 series is well-structured, comprehensive, and demonstrates a strong commitment to upholding the standards set forth by the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ).** The policy effectively addresses the principles, procedures, and quality assurance mechanisms essential for fair and consistent teacher-assessed grading during the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
1. Purpose of the Policy
This policy outlines the approach taken by [School/College Name] to determine fair and evidence-based Teacher Assessed Grades (TAGs) for students in Summer 2021, as per guidance from Ofqual and the JCQ. It also serves as a reference for potential future exam cancellations or disruptions.
2. Roles and Responsibilities
-
Head of Centre: Accountable for the implementation and integrity of this policy and submission of grades.
-
Senior Leadership Team (SLT): Oversight of subject processes and quality assurance.
-
Heads of Department/Faculty: Standardising and ensuring consistency within departments.
-
Teachers: Collecting evidence and determining grades based on professional judgement.
-
Exams Officer: Administering the grade submission process and liaison with awarding bodies.
3. Evidence Base for TAGs
Grades will be based on a holistic, objective judgment of student performance, using a range of evidence, such as:
-
Classwork and homework
-
In-class assessments and tests
-
Mock exams
-
Non-exam assessment (NEA/coursework), where applicable
-
Past papers and exam-style questions conducted under controlled conditions
Note: Evidence must be recent, relevant, and appropriate for the course content covered.
4. Assessment Record Keeping
-
Departments will maintain clear records of the evidence used for each student.
-
Evidence must be stored securely and be available for internal and external quality assurance.
-
Students will be informed of the evidence being used, but not the final submitted grade.
5. Quality Assurance Process
-
Internal Standardisation: Departments will conduct standardisation to ensure consistency.
-
SLT Review: Senior leaders will review a sample of judgements across departments for consistency and fairness.
-
Access Arrangements and Reasonable Adjustments: Considered as part of the grading process for students with special educational needs or disabilities.
6. Avoiding Bias and Ensuring Objectivity
-
All staff involved will complete training on unconscious bias and objective grading.
-
Judgements will be based solely on evidence, not on predicted potential or external pressures.
7. Conflicts of Interest
-
Any potential conflicts (e.g., family members being assessed) will be declared and managed in line with JCQ guidance.
8. Appeals Process
-
Students will be able to appeal through a two-stage process:
-
Centre Review: Internal review for administrative errors.
-
Awarding Body Appeal: Escalation to the exam board if unresolved.
-
9. Retention of Evidence and Records
-
Evidence and records used to determine grades will be retained until at least [insert date, e.g., 31 December 2021], or as directed by JCQ.
-
Digital and physical storage protocols will be followed for data protection.
10. Communication with Stakeholders
-
Clear communication with students and parents/carers throughout the process.
-
Information evenings, letters, and FAQs provided to ensure transparency.
11. Contingency Planning for Future Use
-
This policy will be reviewed annually and updated based on national guidance.
-
In the event of future disruption to public examinations, this framework will be reinstated or modified in line with government and JCQ expectations.
Signed:
Head of Centre: ______________________
Date: ____________________________